In order to be widely accepted, "The Growing and Developing Earth" theory cf. "Expanding Earth Theory through Growing Process", must be changed:

1. Earth's origin from dust gaseous cloud must be replaced with a new concept that such matter is the last product of previous processes and represents only the ruins of the burning process, not capable of creating directly the original burned matter as is. For example, imagine an effort to create from ash and gas, i.e ruins of burned wood, again the wood;
2. Traditional concepts of the origin of inner earth energy;

In science, as in every activity, it is worth the proverbial saying "to take this case with a grain of salt" and to carefully use scientific achievements functionally with our premises of the EE. Afterwards, we probably must ponder that our forum is not in unison for why and how the Earth's radius is enlarged. For example, we all negate the interpretation of convection and subduction as is expressed in the Pangea theory, but these processes and phenomena have their great role in the embryonic phase of core creation, and gradually, with the Growing process and crust thickening, their role in order to circulate the crust failed and, was progressively less important and finally was totally eliminated forever, at least for last Eon.

Yes, geology is the language of the Earth. On the basement of the geology are lying all of natural sciences up to the philosophy: paleozoology, paleobotany, paleography, climatology, geophysics, geochemistry, research geology, stratigraphy, sedimentology, seismicity, volcanology, magmatism, tectonics, hydro geology, hydrography, geomechanics, etc, etc,

The geology reflects very clearly the Earth's formation and its development; development or evolution of life since primitive organisms in first sedimentary strata through all sedimentary sequence up to recent modern life. According to creation, the geology supports the philosophy.

So everyone of us must understand deeply geological phenomena, because if we want to say something on Earth's development, we must understand it deeply.

We have as fulcrum, the inner factor in Earth's growth and development process. The starting point must be here in the mentioned core structure, which reflects processes that cause events and phenomena. I suppose that in the bottom of the outer core, near to the transit geo-sphere, to the inner core, must be an ultra-thin geo-sphere where are concentrated elementary sub-elementary and ultra-elementary particles. By their disintegration, the concentrated ultra-dense matter is transformed into chemical elements, physical fields - including heat radiation, gravity, etc. The greatest part of the transformed matter tends to grow outwardly and only a fraction tends inward. Such Earth processes might be in agreement with new data from the Sun on lower temperatures under the corona. So even in the Sun, such a thin concentrated sphere might be above the sun surface and under the corona.

It may be that some of us still consider the prime-matter as an equivalent to aether; something of the simplest appearance of the corpuscular and wave-field matter. The notion of prime-matter, or aether, is for a certain form of matter still not proved by laboratory experiments. It could not originate the matter, because it is, in itself, a sort of matter. It might be considered as a particle of the universal field, which is not indifferent with other particles, but in permanent interaction and transformation.

The matter is expressed in unlimited hosts of the kinds or shapes of its appearance. Certainly the three forms of a common matter: in vapor, liquid and solid states, as in example of the water, is a property of matter in the shape of chemical elements and their compounds, depending on the temperature-pressure of its surroundings. But the matter in other shapes has its other states of appearance, depending on cosmic, partly unknown surroundings. The particles and sub-particles of the atoms, respectively the molecules, when are released from atomic bonds, or are not combined in forms of chemical elements, then they are in strange states forming dispersed appearance of radiation, fields, etc, or "condensed' appearance of neutron-quark stars, black holes, etc.

The notion of matter, according to today's achievements of discoveries, deep at atom nucleus structure, and far away towards endless directions of space, and integrated all data and interpretation - the notion of matter in physics - and in philosophy as well, is not enclosed only in the three states of common matter - but in all its component parts of particles, sub-particles, aether and particles of so called pre-mmater. By the last concept is implied a sort of sub-particle, still physically undefined, but it interacts and is changed to other sub-particles, particles, and it participates in creation by interaction and transformation in well-known shapes of matter.

The aether is an undefined notion, and it couldn't replace the notion of multitudes of sub-particles and particles. The latters can be concentrated in forms of chemical elements, in forms of the superdense celestial bodies and dispersed in forms of physical fields and radiation.

Consequently, by the notion of so called prime-matter must be implied a certain specie of the sub particle, which cannot be in indivisible and unchangeable state. It might be indivisible, but in no way, in an unchangeable state.