In the natural world, most things occur in loops. That is cause becomes effect and effect becomes cause. It is a logical loop. It doesn't reduce well in the linear logic of most people. This confuses a lot of people. It seems quite logical because of this to understand that whatever process controls earth expansion would be altered by its progress. It is both cause and effect. For those who think A + B = C or other linear logic this is confusing. It doesn't reduce well. It doesn't fit computer programs well either. In the case of EE I expect in time that the reaction rates and end products will be altered by the very planet in which they occur. It is neither linear nor exponental. It is discrete quanta or packages. The reaction would happen one way for a while, and then another for a while and so on because the planet or star it happens on changes the reaction in both the matrix it happens in as well as changing the energy supply for it.

The discussion of time is important because time is a pure and simple man made illusionary construct. I don't mean that things don't age but rather the clock is pure man. Many of the limitations imposed here cause us not to see what is happening or has happened because we live short lives etc. When we attempt to look too far back in time, we get a lot of errors in what we believe. In addition we rely too much on needing to know the end reaction (IE Big Bang). The Big Bang for example is taken as gospel yet even if it occurred it had to do so within an existing matrix of conditions. It wasn't the beginning. It was part of an on going process. Yet that is so far removed from our condition and events that it is really of no value to suppose it.

The Big Bang owes itself to a dynamic effort arising in the 1880's and was very much part of a social event set associated with the fracturing of religion and the rise of evolution. It was a necessity for the evolutionists to be able to destroy the possibility of creation so they latched onto a series of theories that rose up into the "big bang" cosmology. The only problem was that this theory stinks as bad as the simplistic belief of ignorant people. It really has no fact behind it. When Hubble came along the "Hubble Constant" became the holy grail of this pseudo religion or anti-religion religion. It isn't real. There is lots of good cosmologic observation that just dumps it in the trash bin. The "big bang" theory is a reaction to religion and not good science in any way.

With all of this in mind, lets look at what can be expected regards the acceptance of EE. That is what will happen. Some time in the near future we will see a few literate organizations starting to openly accept small parts of the data. In time some parties will openly come out. After that it will get a place in the great discoveries. This path was what Plate Techtonics followed. It just takes people getting out of their chairs (Literally endowments) and new people coming in. I think this process is well under way. It just takes time. We can never expect a thank you note from the gang who comes in. They may not even allow us in the game.

The social effects of understanding this can be quite profound. It really upsets a lot of theoretical constructs from the seas rising due to global warming to issues of atomic physics. This runs a wide gambit. The list of toes stepped on by this theory is just about as long as can be. It pretty much blows up the entire cosmology of the past 100 years. It upsets the nuclear physics group to the limit. Curiously the religious folk may actually like it. It upsets a lot of the people who gave them trouble. Lets resolve to be nice as we can to everyone and have fun. I think science is a lot of fun.

As to the fact of expansion, it may not be accepted, but it is easily observed. It is on going and is observed world wide annually now. GPS etc will make the fact of this even more obvious. One question I have. We have added a leap second to our year several years running. This means that the earth has receeded from the sun by a distance. (How much?) Is this related to the mass or expansion of the earth. It should be because it was to synchronize the rotation and orbit data. I suspect this represents an expansion of about 101 feet at the equator. 2 of these a century would be 202 feet approx or about 2 feet a year. This is pretty close to the supposed observed data. Is this related? Of course some inaccuracy is here. I suspect we are already in possession of absolute measured data on this. My calculation is that since GPS was put up the Earth has grown something like 30 feet or more. This data would likely appear in either an adjustment or some other factor. We might perhaps begin looking for it.